Bathroom Fixture Specification
Checklist.

• ☐ Project name, location and building type recorded
• ☐ Design and procurement stages identified
• ☐ Applicable rooms and user groups defined
• ☐ Standard, premium and accessible room types separated
• ☐ Quantities organized by room, phase and delivery release
• ☐ Owner priorities and operational requirements documented

• ☐ Manufacturer and exact model recorded
• ☐ Configuration and required options identified
• ☐ Exact finish name and code recorded
• ☐ Visible and concealed components included
• ☐ Required accessories and drains listed
• ☐ Approved alternates documented separately

• ☐ Flow and pressure criteria identified
• ☐ Simultaneous shower functions defined
• ☐ Temperature-control method established
• ☐ Sensor behavior and shutoff logic reviewed
• ☐ Power source and backup strategy confirmed
• ☐ Required certifications and listings verified by exact model

• ☐ Current exact-model rough-in obtained
• ☐ Wall, deck, ceiling or floor conditions verified
• ☐ Connection sizes and valve locations coordinated
• ☐ Structural support and blocking resolved
• ☐ Waterproofing penetrations coordinated
• ☐ Service access preserved after finishes are installed

• ☐ Applicable accessible rooms and fixtures identified
• ☐ Clear floor space and approach reviewed
• ☐ Reach ranges and operable parts reviewed
• ☐ Sink, counter, knee and toe clearances coordinated
• ☐ Pipe protection and water-temperature conditions reviewed
• ☐ Installation verified against adopted project requirements

• ☐ Cleaning products and finish-care limits documented
• ☐ Replaceable parts and service points identified
• ☐ Isolation and access locations recorded
• ☐ Attic stock and spare-parts needs evaluated
• ☐ Commissioning responsibilities assigned
• ☐ Manuals, warranty and training included in closeout

• ☐ Intended outlets and operating combinations defined
• ☐ Control, diverter and valve capacity coordinated
• ☐ Dynamic pressure and total demand reviewed
• ☐ Ceiling or wall support verified
• ☐ Drainage and waterproofing coordinated
• ☐ Concealed components remain serviceable

• ☐ Sink, counter and faucet geometry coordinated
• ☐ Hole pattern and mounting thickness verified
• ☐ Flow and application requirements established
• ☐ Drain and supply components included
• ☐ Handle operation and clearances reviewed
• ☐ Finish coordinated with adjacent fixtures

• ☐ Detection zone suits the sink geometry
• ☐ Power and temperature strategy established
• ☐ Control-box and cable clearances preserved
• ☐ Sensor setup and shutoff behavior documented
• ☐ Filter and solenoid access confirmed
• ☐ Commissioning and maintenance responsibilities assigned

• ☐ Soap type and viscosity compatibility verified
• ☐ Dose and refill strategy established
• ☐ Individual or multifeed reservoir selected
• ☐ Tubing routes and service access coordinated
• ☐ Faucet and dispenser placement reviewed together
• ☐ Facilities team accepts the consumable strategy

• ☐ Tub dimensions, weight and support verified
• ☐ Filler location and reach coordinated
• ☐ Fill rate and hot-water capacity reviewed
• ☐ Waste, overflow and drainage compatible
• ☐ Floor- or deck-mounted rough-in confirmed
• ☐ Service access provided

• ☐ Faucet, sink, drain and overflow compatibility verified
• ☐ Counter cutouts and mounting method coordinated
• ☐ Below-deck components do not conflict
• ☐ Millwork allows installation and service
• ☐ Accessible clearances checked where applicable
• ☐ Material-care requirements documented

• ☐ Exact model and finish match the schedule
• ☐ Options, accessories and concealed components are complete
• ☐ Quantities and room assignments are correct
• ☐ Substitutions and deviations are clearly identified

• ☐ Dimensions and rough-ins match coordinated construction
• ☐ Flow, pressure and operating functions meet project criteria
• ☐ Power, controls and connections are coordinated
• ☐ Required exact-model certifications are documented

• ☐ Mounting surfaces and depths are compatible
• ☐ Access and maintenance clearances remain available
• ☐ Finish and sample approval are recorded
• ☐ Lead time aligns with the construction sequence

• ☐ Comments identify required action and responsible party
• ☐ Approved deviations are incorporated into drawings and schedules
• ☐ Revised documents are dated and controlled
• ☐ Review is not treated as relief from installer verification

The party responsible for fixture specification should control the master checklist, while each discipline records its assigned verification. Contract documents govern actual responsibility.

System types should be established early. Exact models should be selected once application, performance, mounting, utilities and finish requirements are sufficiently defined to support meaningful comparison.

The framework can be reused, but project-specific criteria must be added for the building type, jurisdiction, owner standards, contracts and selected products.

No. It records that a topic was reviewed. Compliance requires evaluation of the actual design and installation against applicable adopted requirements and current exact-model documentation.

Compare exact model, configuration, dimensions, rough-in, material, finish, performance, utilities, certification, completeness, serviceability, lead time and installed cost—not appearance alone.

Incomplete assemblies, unverified rough-ins, unresolved power, insufficient hydraulic review, finish assumptions and missing service access commonly cause late coordination problems.